Spearman

(PC) Sierra v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20191:17-cv-01691California1,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCISCO SIERRA, No. 1:17-cv-01691-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

M.E. SPEARMAN, et al., CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 19, 24) 16 17 Plaintiff Francisco Sierra is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 4, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action proceed on plaintiff’s claim against defendant Thompson for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, against defendant Castellanos for cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and that all other claims and defendants be dismissed. (Doc. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.