(HC) Reginald Tanubagijo v. Daniel Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20192:18-cv-02290California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD TANUBAGIJO, No. 2:18-cv-02290-MCE-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER DANIEL PARAMO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a California inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 26, 2019, the district court judge adopted the Findings and Recommendations issued on March 13, 2019 and granted petitioner a stay and abeyance pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063, 1074 (9th Cir. 2002). ECF No. 26. This same order directed petitioner to file a first amended § 2254 petition containing only his first claim for relief which was properly exhausted in state court. ECF No. 26 at 2. In compliance with this order, petitioner filed a first amended § 2254 petition on September 25, 2019. ECF No. 27. However, before the court could stay petitioner’s case to allow him to return to state court to exhaust a second claim for relief, petitioner filed untimely objections to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.