Avila

(PC) Sealy v. Avila

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20192:19-cv-01205California1,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLOYD SEALY, No. 2:19-cv-1205-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AVILA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis, He has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel, a motion for preliminary injunctive relief, and a motion to be transferred. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application and finds that it makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). Motion for Appointment of Counsel District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.