(PC) Alvarado v. County of Tulare

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20191:17-cv-01396California945 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DEAN ALVARADO, JR., Case No. 1:17-cv-01396-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 I. Background Plaintiff Daniel Dean Alvarado, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a former proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 22, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action proceed on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Rales for excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and all other claims and defendants be dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff did not timely file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.