Sullivan

(PC) Tate v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20191:19-cv-00346California175 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DEREK TATE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00346-AWI-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

J COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

(ECF NO. 9) S. SULLIVAN, Defendant. 15 On October 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed a notice! stating that he voluntarily dismissed this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)G). (ECF No. 9). Therefore, this action has been terminated. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to 20 terminate all pending motions and deadlines and close this case. 21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ October 9, 2019 [spe ey □□

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

' Although Plaintiff titled the document as a motion to voluntarily dismiss the complaint, the Court 28 construes the motion as a notice of dismissal.