Baniga

(PC) Garcia v. Baniga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20191:19-cv-01258California596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE GARCIA, 1:19-cv-01258-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT

DR. RODRIGUEZ FOR INADEQUATE

U. BANIGA, M.D., et al., MEDICAL CARE UNDER THE EIGHTH

AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL OTHER

Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

22 Jose Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants Plaintiff names as defendants Dr. U. Baniga, Dr. Rodriguez, California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS), and Does #1-5 (Medical Provider Policy Makers) (collectively, “Defendants”), and brings claims for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment, for …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.