Baniga
(PC) Garcia v. Baniga
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20191:19-cv-01258California596 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOSE GARCIA, 1:19-cv-01258-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
v. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT
DR. RODRIGUEZ FOR INADEQUATE
U. BANIGA, M.D., et al., MEDICAL CARE UNDER THE EIGHTH
AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL OTHER
Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE
DISMISSED
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS
22 Jose Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants Plaintiff names as defendants Dr. U. Baniga, Dr. Rodriguez, California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS), and Does #1-5 (Medical Provider Policy Makers) (collectively, “Defendants”), and brings claims for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment, for …