Guillen

Guillen v. Colombana

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20192:19-cv-00655California1,229 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERICA GUILLEN, No. 2:19-cv-00655-KJM-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICARDO COLOMBANA and

MIRELLA COLOMBANA,

15 Defendants.

17 After an altercation with her husband and his mother resulting in plaintiff’s arrest and detention, plaintiff filed this suit in federal court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction, alleging civil rights claims under § 1985, as well as other state law claims. Compl., ECF No. 1. Having reviewed the allegations of the complaint and the parties’ briefing on defendants’ motions to dismiss, the court orders as follows:1 I. CLAIM ONE Plaintiff’s first claim is for a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3). Compl., ECF No. 1, at 7. As the Ninth Circuit explained in Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026, 1028 n.3 (9th Cir. 26 27 1 In an effort to streamline resolution of motions to dismiss in cases like this one where the parties have counsel, when the court is granting leave to amend it has adopted a shortened…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.