Beard

(PC) Shabazz v. Beard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20191:15-cv-00881California1,131 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMIR SHABAZZ, No. 1:15-cv-00881-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT

IGBINOSA AND TERMINATING ACTION

FELIX IGBINOSA, (Doc. No. 81) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Amir Shabazz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. This matter is presently before the court pursuant to the mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Doc. No. 81), vacating and remanding this court’s previous denial of qualified immunity to defendant Igbinosa. Following this court’s order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss this action, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Hines v. Youseff, 914 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2019). In Hines, a consolidated appeal, the plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of housing inmates in a hyperendemic area for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.