(PC)Perkins

(PC)Perkins v. Brazelton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20191:17-cv-00308California1,710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY PERKINS, No. 1:17-cv-00308-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. CASE, WITH PREJUDICE, ON QUALIFIED

IMMUNITY GROUNDS

PAUL D. BRAZELTON, et al., (Doc. Nos. 18, 21) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Randy Perkins is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff alleges that defendants exhibited deliberate indifference to his high risk of contracting Valley Fever while he was incarcerated at Pleasant Valley State Prison from 2005 to 2010. (Doc. No. 17 at 3.) On June 6, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that this case be dismissed for the failure to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. No. 18.) The findings and recommendations were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.