Ola

(PC) Sifuentes v. Ola

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20191:16-cv-00241California547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIGUEL G. SIFUENTES, 1:16-cv-00241-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER RESCINDING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE

vs. (ECF No. 41.)

DR. OLA, et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Miguel G. Sifuentes is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff paid the $400.00 filing fee for this action on February 25, 2016, and therefore is not proceeding in forma pauperis. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, filed on April 26, 2017, against defendant Dr. Ola (“Defendant”) for failure to provide adequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 21.) On May 15, 2019, the court issued an order directing Plaintiff to serve defendant Dr. Ola with a summons and copy of the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 39.) Because Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis in this case, he was responsible for serving process himself. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.