Manter

Manter v. Fresno Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20191:19-cv-01070California5,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL J. MANTER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01070-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: v. (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

OR,

14 FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES Defendants. TO STAND ON THE COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE DISTRICT

JUDGE CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER 18 (ECF No. 1)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

20 On August 5, 2019, Plaintiff, Michael Manter, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, 21 commenced this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging claims against the Fresno County Police 22 Department and City Hall of Fresno. (ECF No. 1.) The Court has screened the Complaint and has 23 determined that Plaintiff fails to state any cognizable claims.1

I. LEGAL STANDARD

25 A. Screening 26 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), in any case in which a plaintiff is proceeding in forma

1 Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.