Berry

Berry v. Yosemite Community College District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20191:16-cv-00411California489 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 13 DEBRA BERRY, Case No. 1:16-cv-00411-LJO-EPG 14 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: IFP STATUS ON APPEAL 15 v. (ECF NO. 92)

YOSEMITE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

DISTRICT, et al.,

Defendants. By notice entered October 7, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit referred this matter to the District Court for the limited purpose of determining whether the in forma pauperis status of Plaintiff Debra Berry (“Plaintiff”) should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Permitting litigants to proceed in forma pauperis is a privilege, not a right. Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1231 (9th Cir. 1984); Williams v. Field, 394 F.2d 329, 332 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 891 (1968); Williams v. Marshall, 795 F.Supp. 978, 978-79 (N.D. Cal. 1992). A federal court may dismiss a claim filed in forma pauperis prior to service…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.