Lucero

Lucero v. Pennella

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20191:18-cv-01448California525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL ROBERT LUCERO, Case No. 1:18-cv-01448-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR HIS FAILURE

TO PARTICIPATE IN JOINT STATEMENT

ANTHONY ROBERT PENNELLA, et al., AND FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR THE

MANDATORY SCHEDULING

Defendants. CONFERENCE

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

17 Manuel Robert Lucero (“Plainitff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 21, 2018, the order setting the mandatory scheduling conference issued in this action. (ECF No. 17-1.) Pursuant to the order, the parties were ordered to prepare a joint scheduling report and all parties were to attend the scheduling conference on October 15, 2019. (Id. at 2-3; ECF No. 38.) As Plaintiff is not represented by counsel his personal appearance was required at the October 15, 2019 scheduling conference. The order setting the scheduling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.