1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 LEEROY WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:19-cv-000873-DAD-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET

13 v. TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

14 UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, (ECF No. 7)

INC.,

15 Defendant. 16

17 This action was filed on June 25, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On October 15, 2019, Plaintiff 18 filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure dismissing his individual action with prejudice and the action for the class without 20 prejudice. 21 “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his 22 action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’ ” 23 Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) 24 (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). The Ninth Circuit has 25 held that Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet 26 to serve an answer or motion for summary judgment. Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th 27 Cir. 1993). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, 1 | the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, and the 2 | district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc., 193 3 | F.3d at 1078. In this action, no defendant has filed an answer or other responsive pleading. 4 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 5 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Se g | Dated: _ October 16, 2019

9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28