(PC) Davis v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20192:17-cv-00544California283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS DAVIS, No. 2:17-cv-0544 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS B. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 On July 29, 2019, the court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement by October 1, 2019. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. The court will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, an party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.