CSP-Sacramento

(PC) Morris v. CSP-Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20192:17-cv-02286California311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORVILLE M. MORRIS, No. 2:17-cv-2286 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CSP-SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 By order issued June 6, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. ECF No. 17. On July 9, 2019, plaintiff was granted an additional sixty days within which to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 21. Sixty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.