Sims

(PS) Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20191:19-cv-00138California495 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 Case No. 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG

KYLE PETERSEN, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO RESEND DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff, AND FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO

COMPLY WITH SCREENING ORDER

v. (ECF No. 17) ANTHONY SIMS, JR., et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting that the Court resend certain documents. (ECF No. 17.) The Court will grant the motion. On September 27, 2019, the Court entered a Screening Order. (ECF No. 14.) The Screening Order allows Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9), as supplemented (ECF No. 13), to proceed against Defendants Sims and Torres for violations of Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search, and authorizes service of the Third Amended Complaint on Defendants (ECF No. 14). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.