Dzyba
(PS) Yegorov v. Dzyba
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DMITRIY YEGOROV, No. 2:19-cv-01110 MCE AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VERA DZYBA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On July 30, 2019, the court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but rejected his complaint because it did not contain a cognizable cause of action. ECF No. 3. The court granted plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. Id. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Id. at 5-6. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Plaintiff’s mail was returned, and per Local Rule 183(b), plaintiff had 63 days (until October 14, 2019) to update his address with the court. Plaintiff did not update his address. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders,…