Chisholm

(PC) Hickman v. Chisholm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20192:19-cv-01725California348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN DUANE HICKMAN, No. 2:19-cv-1725 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MATT CHISHOLM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A review of this court’s docket reveals that the claims in the instant complaint are identical to those in the earlier filed Hickman v. Chisholm, No. 2:19-cv-1254 TLN AC P (“Hickman I”), which was recently dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The claims in the instant complaint are also identical to those in the subsequently filed Hickman v. Chisholm, No. 2:19-cv-1828 KJM AC P (“Hickman III”), which was also recently dismissed as duplicative of Hickman I. It will therefore be recommended that the instant action be dismissed as duplicative of both Hickman I and Hickman III. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed as 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.