Camargo

(PC) Howell v. Camargo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20191:19-cv-00266California514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, 1:19-cv-00266-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF PROCEED ONLY ON

v. CLAIM I AGAINST DEFENDANTS BARONA,

CAMARGO, MORROW, MUNOZ,

A. CAMARGO, et al., RANDOLPH, AND SAUCEDO AND THAT

ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Defendants. BE DISMISSED

(Docs. 1, 9)

17 14-DAY DEADLINE

Clerk of Court to Assign a District Judge 19 20 Plaintiff Kareem J. Howell is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2019, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff stated cognizable claims for retaliation in Claim I of his complaint, (Doc. 1), against Defendants A. Barona, A. Camargo, C. Morrow, C. Munoz, A. Randolph, and D. Saucedo. (Doc. 9.) The Court found that the remainder of Plaintiff’s claims were deficient. Id. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.