Camargo
(PC) Howell v. Camargo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, 1:19-cv-00266-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF PROCEED ONLY ON
v. CLAIM I AGAINST DEFENDANTS BARONA,
CAMARGO, MORROW, MUNOZ,
A. CAMARGO, et al., RANDOLPH, AND SAUCEDO AND THAT
ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
Defendants. BE DISMISSED
(Docs. 1, 9)
17 14-DAY DEADLINE
Clerk of Court to Assign a District Judge 19 20 Plaintiff Kareem J. Howell is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2019, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff stated cognizable claims for retaliation in Claim I of his complaint, (Doc. 1), against Defendants A. Barona, A. Camargo, C. Morrow, C. Munoz, A. Randolph, and D. Saucedo. (Doc. 9.) The Court found that the remainder of Plaintiff’s claims were deficient. Id. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the…