Penzone

(HC) Bartlett v. Penzone

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20191:19-cv-01370California1,123 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALAN M. BARTLETT, Case No. 1:19-cv-01370-EPG-HC

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF

v. HABEAS CORPUS

PAUL PENZONE,

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

Respondent. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING CLERK OF

COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

17 (ECF No. 2) 18 Petitioner Alan M. Bartlett is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Given that Petitioner does not reside within this judicial district, does not appear to be incarcerated based upon any judgment issued within this judicial district, and does not challenge his underlying conviction or the fact or duration of his confinement, the undersigned recommends that the petition be dismissed. I. DISCUSSION A. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Petitioner has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2). In order to 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.