Pfeifer

(PC) Hill v. Pfeifer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20191:19-cv-01221California1,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAFT L. HILL, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01221-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO v. ) THIS ACTION

) C. PFEIFER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE Defendants. ) ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A ) COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) ) [ECF No. 9] )

Plaintiff Taft L. Hill is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed October 9, 2019. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.