Clark-Barlow

(PC) Hernandez v. Clark-Barlow

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20192:17-cv-01681California2,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY CEASAR HERNANDEZ, No. 2:17-cv-1681-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOE LIZZARAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He filed this action on August 14, 2017. ECF No. 1. On May 1, 2018, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint alleged a cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to medical needs claim against defendant Lisa Clark-Barlow. ECF No. 11. The other defendants listed in plaintiff’s complaint were dismissed on February 5, 2018. ECF Nos. 25 & 34. Now, defendant Clark-Barlow has filed a motion for summary judgment (“motion”) wherein she argues that plaintiff failed to administratively exhaust the claim against her. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff has filed an opposition to the motion. ECF No. 49. After review of the pleadings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.