Wreston

(PC) Azdar v. Wreston

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20191:19-cv-01064California446 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTOR MARTINEZ AZDAR, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01064-LJO-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATION, AND DISMISSING

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

) WRESTON, et al., COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) Defendants. ) [ECF Nos. 10, 11] ) )

Plaintiff Victor Martinez Azdar is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 19, 2019, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the instant action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. The Findings and Recommendation was served on the Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff filed objections on October 17, 2019. In his objections, Plaintiff contends that his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.