Kendall

(PC) Wells v. Kendall

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20192:17-cv-02709California1,140 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE WELLS, No. 2:17-cv-2709 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. KENDALL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In response to this court’s order, plaintiff has submitted a completed USM-285 form for defendant Robenson. ECF No. 48 at 2. He has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel. ECF No. 51. I. Service on Defendant Robenson By order filed August 27, 2019, plaintiff was ordered to provide additional information about defendant Robenson so that he may be served. ECF No. 46 at 1. Plaintiff was explicitly advised that service of process had been unsuccessful “because no individual with that name and working at the prison at the time specified in the complaint could be identified.” Id. Plaintiff has now submitted a USM-285 form for defendant Robenson. ECF No. 48 at 2. However, the only new information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.