Madden

(HC) Konepachit v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20192:19-cv-02058California680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID KONEPACHIT, No. 2:19-cv-2058-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RAYMOND MADDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court has reviewed the petition as required by Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings, and finds that the petition is second or successive and must therefore be dismissed. A petition is second or successive if it makes “claims contesting the same custody imposed by the same judgment of a state court” that the petitioner previously challenged, and on which the federal court issued a decision on the merits. Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147 (2007); see also Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 485-86 (2000). Before filing a second or successive petition in a district court, a petitioner must obtain from the appellate court “an order authorizing the district court to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.