Pfeiffer

(HC) Conners v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20192:19-cv-00638California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENOCH CONNERS, No. 2:19-cv-0638 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PFEIFFER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner alleges prison officials have failed to provide him with a hearing regarding the alleged miscalculation of his release date. By order dated July 31, 2019, the court dismissed the original petition and granted petitioner thirty days leave to file an amended petition. (ECF No. 12.) Petitioner was advised that failure to file an amended petition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Those thirty days have passed, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition, requested additional time to file an amended petition, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to randomly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.