Estate of Alejandro Sanchez v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20191:18-cv-00977California1,116 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTATE OF ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ, et No. 1:18-cv-00977-DAD-BAM al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION v. FOR RECONSIDERATION 14 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (Doc. No. 56) 15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration filed on October 14, 2019. (Doc. No. 56.) Plaintiffs request that the court reverse the assigned magistrate judge’s discovery order granting in part defendants’ motion for a protective order. (Doc. No. 31.) Having considered the parties’ briefing, plaintiffs’ motion will be denied. BACKGROUND The factual background is drawn from plaintiffs’ motion. On February 1, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge approved a stipulated protective order in this case. (Doc. No. 21.) That order outlined procedures by which the parties could designate certain materials produced in discovery as confidential and provided that if the parties were unable to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.