King

(PC) Chester v. King

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20191:16-cv-01257California1,549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND D. CHESTER, 1:16-cv-01257-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS KING,

SANDHU AND WITHROW’S REQUEST TO

vs. SEAL EXHIBITS (ECF No. 37-9.) AUDREY KING, et al.,

Defendants.

18 I. BACKGROUND Raymond D. Chester (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint filed on August 31, 2016, against defendants Audrey King (Executive Director), Jagsir Sandhu, M.D. (Chief Medical Officer), Bradley Powers, M.D. (Unit Physician), and Robert Withrow, M.D. (Medical Director of CSH) for failing to provide adequate medical care to Plaintiff in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 10.) On June 21, 2019, all of the defendants filed a Stipulation and [proposed] Protective Order regarding disclosure of confidential health information and personal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.