Foster

Foster v. Division of Adult Parole Operations

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20191:19-cv-00987California4,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLOYD FOSTER JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00987-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT SECOND

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE STATE A CLAIM OPERATIONS, et al., (ECF No. 13) Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

17 Floyd Foster Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2019, a screening order was filed finding that Plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable claim and granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 5.) On August 28, 2019, Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was screened and it was found that Plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff was granted one final opportunity to file a second amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) After Plaintiff did not file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.