Foster
Foster v. Division of Adult Parole Operations
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FLOYD FOSTER JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00987-LJO-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT SECOND
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE STATE A CLAIM OPERATIONS, et al., (ECF No. 13) Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
17 Floyd Foster Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2019, a screening order was filed finding that Plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable claim and granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 5.) On August 28, 2019, Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was screened and it was found that Plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff was granted one final opportunity to file a second amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) After Plaintiff did not file…