Sims

(PS) Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20191:19-cv-00138California727 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 Case No. 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG

KYLE PETERSEN, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR COPY OF SERVICE

DOCUMENTS

v. (ECF No. 19) ANTHONY SIMS, JR., et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion requesting that the Court send him copies of the documents required to accomplish service on Defendants. (ECF No. 19.) The Court will deny the motion without prejudice. On September 27, 2019, the Court entered a Screening Order. (ECF No. 14.) The Screening Order allows Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9), as supplemented (ECF No. 13), to proceed against Defendants Sims and Torres for violations of Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search, and authorizes service of the Third…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.