Davey

(PC) Cohea v. Davey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20191:19-cv-01281California1,437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY JAMES COHEA, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01281-LJO-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S v. ) OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING

) DAVE DAVEY, et al., PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ) RESTRAINING ORDER Defendants. ) ) [ECF Nos. 5, 6] )

Plaintiff Danney James Cohea is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on September 13, 2019, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. On September 17, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because Plaintiff has suffered three or more strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and he failed to demonstrate that at the time of filing the complaint he was in imminent danger of serious physical harm. The Findings and 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.