(PC) Ausborn v. CHCF California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20192:19-cv-00960California1,185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY AUSBORN, No. 2:19-cv-0960 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. CHCF CALIFORNIA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner at the California Health Care Facility (CHCF), under the authority of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 13, 2019, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and found that service was not appropriate. ECF No. 37. Plaintiff was granted leave to file a Fifth Amended Complaint, and provided with information about the applicable legal standards and pleading requirements. Id. By order filed October 2, 2019, the district judge adopted the undersigned’s findings and recommendations that defendants

Plaintiff filed five putative complaints between May 20, 2019 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.