Odeluga

(PC) Gray v. Odeluga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20191:19-cv-00183California2,716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LE’BARRON GRAY, Case No. 1:19-cv-0183-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A

RESPONSE

v. (Doc. 13) DR. N. ODELUGA, et al., Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint asserting constitutional claims against 17 governmental employees. (Doc. 13.) Generally, the Court is required to screen complaints brought 18 by inmates seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental 19 entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner 20 has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which 21 relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such 22 relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that 23 may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the 24 action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.