Burns

(PC) Howell v. Burns

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20191:19-cv-00715California653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00715-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION MR. J. BURNES, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 9, 10) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Kareem J. Howell is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 8, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated cognizable claims against Defendants Burnes, Babb, Tumacder, and Sexton for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment, retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, and conspiracy; against Defendant Sanchez for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.