Maric

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS MARIC, No. 1:19-cv-00775-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS

BRIAN ERICKSON, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants. (Doc. No. 4) 16 17 This matter is before the court on defendants’ unopposed motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. No. 4.) Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. A hearing on the motion was held on October 16, 2019. (Doc. No. 9.) Despite having failed to file any opposition to the motion and despite not responding to the court’s October 4, 2019 email seeking to ascertain whether he intended to file a statement of opposition or non-opposition to the pending motion, plaintiff appeared at the noticed October 16, 2019 hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss. At that hearing, plaintiff was informed that, pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), “[a] failure to file a timely opposition may [] be construed by the Court as a non-opposition to the motion.” …