City of Los Angeles v. Sprint Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20192:17-cv-00811California6,429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CITY OF LOS ANGELES ex rel. No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC

RICHARD KNUDSEN,

11 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.; NEXTEL

OF CALIFORNIA, INC. dba NEXTEL

COMMUNICATIONS AND SPRINT

NEXTEL; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Nextel of California, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Consolidated Complaint in Intervention. (ECF No. 82.) Plaintiff City of Los Angeles (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 89.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 82.) /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff contracted with Defendants for wireless airtime, wireless data, and equipment. (ECF No. 1-2 ¶ 1.) Plaintiff alleges Defendants agreed to provide Plaintiff with rate plan optimization on a quarterly or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.