McCauley
(PC) Gustard v. McCauley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRISTOPHER GUSTARD, No. 2:17-cv-0012-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KAMALA HARRIS, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a federal inmate proceeding without counsel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following screening, the filing of an amended complaint, and a substitution, claims against four defendants remain in the action: Morazzini, McKinney, Zuniga, and McCauley. ECF No. 34. Morazzini, McKinney, and McCauley move to dismiss the claims against them. ECF Nos. 51, 52. For the reasons that follow, Morazzini’s motion should be granted. The motion filed by McKinney and McCauley should be granted in part and denied in part. I. Plaintiff’s Allegations Plaintiff had a license to practice as a landscape architect in California. ECF No. 30 at 14. During the process of renewing the license, he informed the California Architects Board’s Landscape Architecture Technical Committee…