Pride Industries, Inc. v. Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20192:19-cv-01620California5,767 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRIDE INDUSTRIES, INC., No. 2:19-cv-01620 KJM CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM

PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR

15 SEVERELY DISABLED, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On August 26, 2019, plaintiff PRIDE Industries, Inc. (“PRIDE”) moved to 19 preliminarily enjoin the U.S. AbilityOne Commission (“AbilityOne” or “defendants”) from 20 taking any further action under a Pilot Program to award a contract for services at United States 21 Army Base Fort Bliss (“Fort Bliss”). Compl., ECF No. 6-1. Plaintiff alleges the Pilot Program 22 conflicts with the statutorily prescribed system for contract selection under the Javits-Wagner 23 O’Day Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 8501–8506 (“JWOD Act”). Compl. at 1. Defendants oppose the 24 motion, Opp’n, ECF No. 32, and plaintiff has replied, Reply, ECF No. 36. The court heard oral 25 argument on the motion on October 24, 2019. After thorough consideration of the arguments and 26 the governing law, the court DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.