Johal
(PC) Rose v. Johal
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLEVELAND ZACHARY ROSE, 1:18-cv-01600-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CASE WHY ACTION
v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
A. JOHAL, et al., THE COURT’S ORDER
Defendants. (Docs. 12, 14)
16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Cleveland Zachary Rose is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On August 13, 2019, the Court issued its second screening order, finding that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims in his first amended complaint and granting Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint (SAC). (Doc. 12.) On September 12, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, (Doc. 13), providing Plaintiff an additional 21 days to file his SAC. (Doc. 14.) Although more than a month has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or to otherwise respond to the Court’s screening order. The Local…