Johal

(PC) Rose v. Johal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20191:18-cv-01600California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLEVELAND ZACHARY ROSE, 1:18-cv-01600-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CASE WHY ACTION

v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

A. JOHAL, et al., THE COURT’S ORDER

Defendants. (Docs. 12, 14)

16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Cleveland Zachary Rose is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On August 13, 2019, the Court issued its second screening order, finding that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims in his first amended complaint and granting Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint (SAC). (Doc. 12.) On September 12, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, (Doc. 13), providing Plaintiff an additional 21 days to file his SAC. (Doc. 14.) Although more than a month has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or to otherwise respond to the Court’s screening order. The Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.