(PS) Whitsitt v. Select Staffing
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 2:18-cv-1866 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK
TO SEND MATERIALS FOR SERVICE
SELECT STAFFING; COSTCO AND REQUIRING SERVICE BY
WHOLESALE MEATS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL
15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff William Whitsitt is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On July 13, 2018, plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3.) On May 20, 2019, plaintiff was granted leave to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on June 19, 2019. (ECF No. 9.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, the second amended complaint…