(PS) Whitsitt v. Select Staffing

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20192:18-cv-01866California672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 2:18-cv-1866 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK

TO SEND MATERIALS FOR SERVICE

SELECT STAFFING; COSTCO AND REQUIRING SERVICE BY

WHOLESALE MEATS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL

15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff William Whitsitt is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On July 13, 2018, plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3.) On May 20, 2019, plaintiff was granted leave to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on June 19, 2019. (ECF No. 9.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, the second amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.