LLoyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, JR., No. 2:18-cv-02420-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Currently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint (“FAC”). (ECF Nos. 33, 34.) The court deemed this matter suitable for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 230(g). Having considered the motion, opposition, and reply papers, and the record in this matter, the court recommends denying the motion. II. Background On February 7, 2019, the undersigned entered findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of plaintiff’s claims against all defendants except his § 1983, California Bane Act, and battery claims against defendant Ken Lloyd…