Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Comenity Capital Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20191:19-cv-00342California7,381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LORI ANN GONZALEZ, individually and CASE NO. 1:19-CV-00342-AWI-EPG on behalf of others similarly situated, 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT COMENITY CAPITAL BANK’S MOTION TO v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

COMENITY CAPITAL BANK, DOES 1-

30, (Doc. No. 20)

Defendants.

14 15 16 INTRODUCTION This is a putative class action in which Plaintiff Lori Ann Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) alleges that Defendant Comenity Capital Bank (“Comenity Capital”) has violated California statutes relating to identity theft in connection with credit card accounts branded for retailers Blair and Overstock.com (the “Accounts” or, individually, the “Account”). Comenity Capital contends that arbitration agreements apply to Gonzalez’s claims as to both Accounts and has brought a motion for an order compelling arbitration pursuant to the terms of those agreements. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny Comenity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.