Baser

(PC) Payne v. Baser

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20192:18-cv-00956California267 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVANCE ROSS PAYNE, No. 2:18-cv-0956 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C. BASER, et al., Defendants. 16 On July 26, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has been warned that failure to file an amended complaint within the time allotted would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 33. Plaintiff’s amended complaint was due October 16, 2019 (id.) and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.