Hicks

(PC) Ardds v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20191:18-cv-01324California7,496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01324-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND

v. (ECF No. 23) D. HICKS, et al.,

Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

16 17 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on September 21, 2018, and the matter was transferred to this Court on September 26, 2018. (ECF Nos. 1 and 3.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on December 11, 2018, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 23.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.