Conanon

(PC) Hisle v. Conanon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20191:17-cv-01400California7,269 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS CURTIS HISLE, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01400-LJO-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) REGARDING DEFENDANT CONANAN’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

) MARLYN CONANAN, et al., ) [ECF No. 68] Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Dennis Curtis Hisle is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant Dr. Conanan’s motion for summary judgment, filed June 17, 2019. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding against Defendants Marlyn Conanan and John Doe (at Mercy Hospital) for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need.1 ///

1 On June 18, 2019, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint to identify the “Doe” Defendant as Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.