(SS) Rhoades v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20192:18-cv-01264California1,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY R RHOADES, No. 2:18-cv-1264 JAM KJN Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING STIPULATED EAJA

AWARD; AND

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT EAJA AWARD

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF No. 22.) 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security concerning the ALJ’s denial of benefits. (ECF No. 1.) The underlying action proceeded before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(15), but not all parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. (See ECF No. 7.) On July 11, 2019 the undersigned entered findings and recommendations for the case to be remanded for further administrative proceedings. (ECF No. 19). No objections were filed, and the district court adopted the F&Rs and entered judgment on August 8, 2019. (ECF No. 20.) Within 30 days of final judgment,1 Plaintiff filed a stipulation for EAJA Attorney Fees, and submitted a proposed order for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.