Ruggiero

(PC) Zwirn v. Ruggiero

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20192:19-cv-01173California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ZWIRN, No. 2: 19-cv-01173-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. RUGGIERO, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this action in the Amador Superior Court on February 21, 2017. (See ECF No. 1.) On June 25, 2019, Defendant Ruggiero removed the action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, on the grounds that Plaintiff raises a federal question. (Id.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 1, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was re-served with the Findings and Recommendations on August 21, 2019, following Plaintiff’s Request for Status. (See ECF No. 6.) Neither party has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.