(PS)Howell

(PS)Howell v. PNC Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20192:18-cv-03113California310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC S. HOWELL; GENEVIEVE F. No. 2:18-cv-03113-TLN-DB

HOWELL,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. PNC BANK; AND, DOES 1 THROUGH

INCLUSIVE,

16 Defendants. 18 Plaintiffs Eric S. Howell and Genevieve F. Howell are proceeding pro se in the above- entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 18, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service of the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 17.) The time for filing objections has expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.