(PS) Miller v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20192:17-cv-00759California1,378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

21 A. Plaintiff’s Allegations 22 This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint. Plaintiff alleges: 23 The Doctor George W. Chiu of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Sacramento, showed “absolute disregard in performing prostate surgery sealed off the drain to my right kidney.”. . . In fact several procedures including a surgery was needed to unseal the right kidney drain, which Dr. George W. Chiu had sealed during prostate surgery. Then he denied this had happened and refused to address the problem.

ECF No. 13. / / / B. Defendants’ Evidence Defendants contend the following facts are undisputed:

1. On August 31, 2015, plaintiff submitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs an administrative tort claim regarding the allegations set forth in the complaint.

2. On March 1, 2016, the Department of Veterans Affairs sent plaintiff a letter via certified mail denying his claim. 6 3. Plaintiff filed the current action on April 10, 2017. 7 See ECF No. 24-2 (defendants’ separate statement of undisputed facts). 8 9 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.